Maroy wrote:
Okay, it sounds like you need to increase the minimum distance between the variator cones at high speeds, while leaving the maximum distance between the cones unchanged. The variator cones are at their maximum separation while stopped, and at very low speeds.
Yes. Exactly.
Adding 2mm of washers to the end of the centre pin will solve the belt rubbing on the crank end, but will only cause new rubbing on the clutch end as the belt is forced out too far (distance at rest between the lower parts of the sheaves is now too far apart).
Adding 2mm to the gap between the sheaves but not between them (the I.D. of the 2mm washer sits on the O.D. of the centre pin), similar to what is done on some 50cc speed-limited scooters, will not affect the variator gap at rest (so no rubbing on the clutch end of the case), but will bring the variator gap at full top speed back to standard, so no rubbing on the case at the sump end.
I have made the washer up out of hardened steel (and smoothed it out obviously after machining), but have not fitted it yet, as I'm unsure whether the centre pin is of hard enough steel to take the added washer sliding around loose over it's outer surface.
The quickest most effective way to fix the issue for this new variator, and it would seem only for those customers who insist on using the very top 10% of speed available from it's design, is for Dr Pulley to either re-design the variator belt ramps to remove this extra 2mm, thereby bringing it back to the standard gap, or for us customers to machine 2mm off the end of the centre pin, then add a 2mm thick washer that is firmly bolted between the centre pin and the fixed pulley, but high enough to stop the variator 2mm out from it's stop.
This washer should be 17.4mm I.D. to fit over the shaft, and over 30mm O.D. to then stop the variator sheaves coming together too close (combined with the centre pin being machined 2mm).
Note this is ONLY for the Quasar engine. I have also checked the 125cc Leader casing on my 2010 Aprilia Sportcity One, and I feel the variator would be bloody brilliant in that bike, promising both excellent acceleration COMBINED with an increased top speed. The Leader casing has much more room for the belt and drivetrain.
I live 200 miles from the nearest traffic light and machinist, which is why I haven't fitted mine yet. I can't get the bits made for me easily or quickly, and I need it to get to work.
If you don't use that last final 10% of available top speed or full throttle, then the belt won't ride up too far and contact the case, using Dr Pulley's suggested fitment details. Yeah, right.
Unfortunately Dr Pulley, in this instance I am afraid the product you have designed is excellent in it's manufacture, beautifully created, but was not fully tested in ALL environments before product release. A performance variator that causes problems for the owners when used in extended high speed running is an oxymoron. It is also not good for sales in those areas likely to exprience this extended high speed running........which means at least Europe, Nth America and Australia. ALL of us in these places are capable of holding the throttle completely flat until the bike uses a whole tank of fuel, not flat for 3 mins until you run out of road or encounter thick traffic.
I still have my Dr Pulley variator kit, but until I can manufacture a hardened steel washer 2mm thick, 17.4mm I.D. and 36mm O.D., and then machine 2mm off my supplied-in-the-kit centre pin, I will not be fitting it, no matter how pretty and shiny it is, and no matter how much I admire Dr Pulleys other product.
If I want to go fast, I will get out the modified 1987 Vmax or my TT Supra, but my scooter which gets all my road km will stay slow and reliable.
⚠️ Last edited by MODNROD on UTC; edited 1 time