Re: ...
bruceb17 wrote:
I agree - better to have an expensive mp3 in the US than none at all.
Although I myself regard mp3's as "cadillac" of urban scooters, I never thought Piaggio did an adequate job of explaining to a prospective buyer why they should spend a premium amount for the extra wheel. Their USA website merely stated that it's improved smoother ride - foregoing any mention of safety benefits.
Although I coveted an mp3 for years, I stayed away because I couldn't justify spending $9k on a 250cc scooter (after tax & license) when there were plenty of good scooters with equal power for 1/2 the price.
The sad part is - there are so few in my neck of woods that wherever I go, people want to know more about it, and many saying, "That is so cool. Where can I get one?" And I have to tell them that the only way to buy one is a used one off Craigslist.
I think a major mistake that Piaggio made was bringing the MP3 250 to the US first (or at all). Definitely underpowered for the American market - and really for American driving conditions as well. The MP3 is a commuting bike or a touring bike. There are better Paiggios for just tooling around town. By the time the 400 and 500 came out the lack of sales success of the 250 pretty much put Piaggio off on supporting further imports IMHO.
I bought an MP3 250 in 2007 because the 400 wasn't available. After it was totaled eight months later I moved up to a 400. I would not be able to do the things I do now on the 250 - particularly commuting on the freeway at 70+ mph. The acceleration of the 400, especially in the mid range, makes it viable for me.
I really would like to have the option of a new MP3 500 in the future should I want to replace my current bike. That doesn't look too hopeful right now.