I was suggesting that the plain rings would be good for more revs than the Dykes type, mainly due to drag from the large surface contact area.
I know all about how hard & brittle they are... they should have special instructions that have a heading that reads "for the ham fisted amateur mechanic".
The piston design has some of the benefits of the Malossi type with the cutaways... I assume that there is much better flow because of this.
.jpg)
Scooter Center Koln wrote:
We wanted to find out how the piston needs to be designed in order to give enough room to the transfer ports to guarantee a good situation. The piston had been constructed in a way, that the hole around the gudgeon pin close to the transfer ports could be adapted by milling.
After every little step, we put it to the test on our dynamometer to find out, which shape or which combination works best.
The original test piston was shaped like the original PX piston. So, for the red graph, the piston skirt was closed (like for a Piaggio, Polini, Grand Sport, ...).
The blue graph shows the result of the piston with a few millimetres less around the gudgeon pin. You can see such a piston on the picture above.
The green graph shows the performance with a semi-closed transfer port at the cylinder base and an adapted piston. The free space of the transfer ports in the cylinder base represents about 80% of the possible space of the cylinder.
RED GRAPH: closed piston skirt
BLUE GRAPH: semi-closed piston skirt
GREEN GRAPH: opened piston skirt