Jim, I applaud your tolerance.
There are arguments for dynamic balancing that go beyond what any sane person would desire to replicate in this thread. Properly done it has merit, especially for the wide wheels used on modern cars/trucks. It measures forces not possible in static balancing, race cars aside.
having worked for years in a tire factory it is quite true that tires get variable builds and variable standards for balance and much more before they are shipped for use. OE tires alone, often have a different standard than replacement tires as manufactured. Race tires are in a special place and priced accordingly too.
FWIW ( once upon a time) I often performed repairs to the machine that dropped colored wax spots on passenger tires that indicated the balance category of that tire. As my old brain recalls there were 3 colors of melted wax used then.
The best argument for static balancing is it's simple and can be done on a cheap stand at home and it works OK. Many of us already know how to do it and don't require a tutorial.
I will throw in here that, like many others, I tape the weights on the wheel temporarily with masking tape until I achieve best balance. I never use duct tape as I have not found it necessary, even one time.
This thread began with the OP stating information that is known here on MV to be lacking in model year application and tire PSI logic.
It's hard to keep this ship, i.e., this thread from sinking given where it began?