I've spent pretty much the whole weekend writing and testing code, using a backup of the real database to rehearse the data
ballet mosh pit.
Ironfoot wrote:
Wow, that's many more unattached inline images than I would have guessed. Must be a fairly large group of us utilising the hack?
It seems high because it's completely wrong. I was conflating the numbers. Here are some better ones:
There are 34,792 orphaned attachments. Of those, 552 appear as inline image references somewhere in a public post, and therefore aren't truly orphans, as such. They will be spared.
The remaining 34,240 will most likely be deleted, as they are essentially inaccessible to the public. I have no way of knowing if any of those are being hotlinked from offsite, as we're not keeping any kind of traffic statistics on the images in the CDN. If they
are being hotlinked from offsite, then, well, those are going to go dark shortly.