professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
I’m not trading it in, but yo, it’s a lot of problems to put up with and shit if someone wanted to trade me a 2018 I’d probably do it.
Sounds like you’re unhappy with it. You should move it on.
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
Top speed vs horsepower, ok then it’s a racing bike or something?
No, that’s not what I said. I said top speed and horsepower are not the same thing. The rev limiter kicks in to prevent the engine from
actually eating itself. If the piston were allowed to accelerate faster, it would actually start breaking apart. Because physics.
The increased horsepower produced by the engine benefits performance at
every point in the RPM range, not just the RPM limit. Going up hills at freeway speed, for instance, can be a challenge on the GTS. This is but a single example.
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
maybe don’t market it as a touring bike capable of long distance travel if it’s not! Especially if it can’t go 500 miles without needing, by the manuals standards, to be serviced!
Is it 200 or is it 500? Those pesky facts again.
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
The warranty is factually worse than it used to be
How so? Please enlighten me.
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
and the problem with the company knowing about what’s causing it and not doing anything might actually be you unintentionally indicting the company’s ethics and standards even if you don’t want to.
Okay, stop. Full stop. That’s a
bullshit statement right there. Just because they’re aware that it consumes more oil does not mean that there’s a problem, or that they are ethically obligated to change it. Engineering is the art of compromise. Every single engineering decision has trade offs. If they have decided that increased oil consumption is a worthwhile trade-off for increased performance, that’s their decision. It’s
your right as a consumer to either agree or disagree with that trade-off and then make your purchases accordingly.
Please stop spouting nonsense about ethics.
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
I mean my 250 hit the rev limiter plenty
Sure. On flat ground and not riding into a headwind. And probably not with a passenger. Or any other of the many reasons why you might need more power. Point is that top speed and horsepower ARE NOT THE SAME. Jeebus.
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
also this new rev limiter is much more dramatic than the previous ones, idk where the demand for horse power in a 300 pound vehicle comes from but it’s silly. Rally racing bike
Then why the @#$% did you buy it?
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
Like look I’ll keep the bike it’s aesthetically gorgeous, it operates fine, but it is absolutely stupid to have a touring bike that cannot tour
Bullshit statement.
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
that realistically seems more designed to like compete in some scooter racing event that is done like twice a year
Bullshit statement.
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
Stopping and waiting an hour and a half for the bike to cool and Filling the oil up on a literal grand turismo is dumb.
Do you do a lot of days over 500 miles? I’ll bet you don’t.
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
You can romanticize how you put up with it all day, but at the end of the day, you put up with it and it’s dumb.
Sounds like you don’t like the bike. Sell it so we can stop having this frankly pointless conversation.
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
but also like, it’s still dumb I have to fill up the oil every 200 miles
First you said 200, then you said 500, now you’re saying 200 again. FFS will you pick a number and stick to it already?
professorcatfacemeowmers wrote:
Sure I can soak in the feelings of some small town I’m stuck in for an hour or two and that might change perspectives on life and stuff
Dude. Sounds like you’ve got bigger problems than the bike. Sorry, can’t help you with that.