NOTE: This topic has a wiki article associated with it. You may view it here.
OP
@jess avatar
UTC

Petty Tyrant
0:7 And counting
Joined: UTC
Posts: 37014
Location: Bay Area, California
 
Petty Tyrant
@jess avatar
0:7 And counting
Joined: UTC
Posts: 37014
Location: Bay Area, California
UTC quote
Created article FAQ: The engine sounds different when I hold the rear brake

(This message was automatically generated)
⬆️    About 8 months elapsed    ⬇️
OP
@jess avatar
UTC

Petty Tyrant
0:7 And counting
Joined: UTC
Posts: 37014
Location: Bay Area, California
 
Petty Tyrant
@jess avatar
0:7 And counting
Joined: UTC
Posts: 37014
Location: Bay Area, California
UTC quote
Changed the name of this topic to better reflect a question.
⬆️    About 5 months elapsed    ⬇️
@wetspeed avatar
UTC

GTed4LIFE
'05 GT200
Joined: UTC
Posts: 240
Location: Moreno Valley So Cal USA
 
GTed4LIFE
@wetspeed avatar
'05 GT200
Joined: UTC
Posts: 240
Location: Moreno Valley So Cal USA
UTC quote
A different Theroy
I would like to offer a different Theory. The engine is isolated from the frame by rubber bushings whether the rear brake is applied or not. The axle is under load from the weight of the scooter and the rider. The force of the brake pad transferred to the rear axle is minimal when the scooter is setting still.

So IMHO the clamping of the brake pad to the rear disc does little to nothing to change the sound and vibration. What does go from an isolated to non isolated state is the hydraulic fluid and line activating the rear brake. Unpressurized the rubber hose and fluid dampen sound and vibration transferred from engine to frame. Pressurized, the fluid and the line become almost solid ending the damping and create a conduit for the sound and vibration to be transferred from engine to the frame. If the rear brake was activated by a cable, the change in sound and vibration would be less because of the cable being made of many stands of wire and having more flexibility than the hydraulic line and fluid under pressure.
OP
@jess avatar
UTC

Petty Tyrant
0:7 And counting
Joined: UTC
Posts: 37014
Location: Bay Area, California
 
Petty Tyrant
@jess avatar
0:7 And counting
Joined: UTC
Posts: 37014
Location: Bay Area, California
UTC quote
I hadn't heard that theory before, but it's a good one. I never really thought of the hydraulic line becoming like a solid, but in a sense it really does.

I don't think there's anything at all wrong with adding this theory to the existing article. It's at least as good as the one that's already there.
@jrsjr avatar
UTC

Molto Verboso
Nazgul
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1985
Location: North Chesterfield, VA
 
Molto Verboso
@jrsjr avatar
Nazgul
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1985
Location: North Chesterfield, VA
UTC quote
Re: A different Theroy
wetspeed wrote:
Pressurized, the fluid and the line become almost solid ending the damping and create a conduit for the sound and vibration to be transferred from engine to the frame. If the rear brake was activated by a cable, the change in sound and vibration would be less because of the cable being made of many stands of wire and having more flexibility than the hydraulic line and fluid under pressure.
Instead, couldn't you test that theory by hooking up a brake line, master cylinder, and lever setup that's not touching the frame in any way (maybe just run a long brake line to a second bike's master cylinder) and just applying the brake? That way, there'd be no conduit to transfer sound and vibration to the frame of the test bike. Just a thought if somebody wants to get all empirical and stuff.
⬆️    About 7 years elapsed    ⬇️
UTC

Ossessionato
2016 Vespa GTS300ie abs/asr/ess Settantesimo '70'
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3766
Location: East Anglia, UK
 
Ossessionato
2016 Vespa GTS300ie abs/asr/ess Settantesimo '70'
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3766
Location: East Anglia, UK
UTC quote
Also, don't forget the brake applies the stop light. This high wattage bulb loads the generator at idle and increases the load (albeit lightly) on the engine, and possibly further changing the engine note. This will be even more noticeable when the battery is not fully charged. Just another thought! It's probably all of the things mentioned in this thread above put together.
⬆️    About 1 year elapsed    ⬇️
@theflaming avatar
UTC

Hooked
2017 BMW C 650 GT
Joined: UTC
Posts: 138
Location: Brooklyn New York
 
Hooked
@theflaming avatar
2017 BMW C 650 GT
Joined: UTC
Posts: 138
Location: Brooklyn New York
UTC quote
Stromrider wrote:
Also, don't forget the brake applies the stop light. This high wattage bulb loads the generator at idle and increases the load (albeit lightly) on the engine, and possibly further changing the engine note. This will be even more noticeable when the battery is not fully charged. Just another thought! It's probably all of the things mentioned in this thread above put together.
TOTALLY AGREE ON THAT!
@jkj-fz6 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
BV400, Primavera 150, Yamaha Zuma 125
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4245
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
 
Ossessionato
@jkj-fz6 avatar
BV400, Primavera 150, Yamaha Zuma 125
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4245
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
UTC quote
Theflaming wrote:
Stromrider wrote:
Also, don't forget the brake applies the stop light. This high wattage bulb loads the generator at idle and increases the load (albeit lightly) on the engine, and possibly further changing the engine note. This will be even more noticeable when the battery is not fully charged. Just another thought! It's probably all of the things mentioned in this thread above put together.
TOTALLY AGREE ON THAT!
Couldn't that be tested by applying the rear brake, then the front? Either lever activates the brake light. The electrical load is the same. Does the engine sound different depending on whether the front or rear brake is applied?
@jimc avatar
UTC

Moderaptor
The Hornet (GT200, aka Love Bug) and 'Dimples' - a GTS 300
Joined: UTC
Posts: 43463
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
 
Moderaptor
@jimc avatar
The Hornet (GT200, aka Love Bug) and 'Dimples' - a GTS 300
Joined: UTC
Posts: 43463
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
UTC quote
JKJ-FZ6 wrote:
Theflaming wrote:
Stromrider wrote:
Also, don't forget the brake applies the stop light. This high wattage bulb loads the generator at idle and increases the load (albeit lightly) on the engine, and possibly further changing the engine note. This will be even more noticeable when the battery is not fully charged. Just another thought! It's probably all of the things mentioned in this thread above put together.
TOTALLY AGREE ON THAT!
Couldn't that be tested by applying the rear brake, then the front? Either lever activates the brake light. The electrical load is the same. Does the engine sound different depending on whether the front or rear brake is applied?
Yes it does, that's the whole point. The front brake doesn't lock the rear suspension. The rear brake does, and thereby changes the resonant frequencies of the whole engine and frame.

A 20W bulb sucks up a whopping 0.025hp. Arguably this might make a noticeable difference if the charging system is weak and the battery is shagged, but I doubt it.
NOTE: This topic has a wiki article associated with it. You may view it here.
DoubleGood Design banner

Modern Vespa is the premier site for modern Vespa and Piaggio scooters. Vespa GTS300, GTS250, GTV, GT200, LX150, LXS, ET4, ET2, MP3, Fuoco, Elettrica and more.

Buy Me A Coffee
 

Shop on Amazon with Modern Vespa

Modern Vespa is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com


All Content Copyright 2005-2024 by Modern Vespa.
All Rights Reserved.


[ Time: 0.0266s ][ Queries: 3 (0.0047s) ][ Debug on ][ 313 ][ Thing One ]