The first thing that comes into mind is how compact the Malossi and the SR3 are compared to the sito plus, they are tiny. the Sito plus is too bulky, too wide and it hangs too low.
The Malossi is by far the best fitting exhaust of the three. It has the most clearance by far, it doesn't hand low and is so well tucked up. The finish is in my opinion much better.
The SR3 has ugly welds, hangs very low and it has a tip that protrudes too far down. The main body has too much gap to the swing arm, they should have tucked the box up another 1 to 1 1/4". The long elbow bend coming from the cylinder has a bad design because it has a slope and is point down towards the front of the scooter. The Malossi is flat.
The sito has nothing but negative feedback, it fits the frame but it is a very old design with huge gaps between the body and the swing arm.
As far is the clearance to the ground, the Malossi just blows away the other two. I am disappointed on the poor ground clearance of the SR3. I though that they advertised as being a product improved over classic competitors(Malossi /polini) but I can sear up and down that this is not the case, the Malossi is far better finished and with massive clearance to the ground.
As far is performance, I had a chance to go out and compare the exhaust. The SR3 is a clear winner hands down. It has better torque in the midrange to the Malossi but it really crushes it in the top end. It pulls significantly harder in the top end.
My plan is to get on a nearby desert road and go with my measurement equipment, Dragy, another GPS, tachometer and do some precise roll acceleration, top speed and acceleration from a dead stop. I want to measure the decibels as well.
Here are some pictures that I just took today in similar fashion as the ones that I took last week, riding two up. The red scooter has a Malossi box.
⚠️ Last edited by scooterist on UTC; edited 1 time