jess wrote:
Thinking some more about F1 vs MotoGP, one of the unexpected things that (IMHO) makes F1 interesting are the pit stops. Seems weird, right? But bear with me. Pit stops throw an element of randomness into a race, and has the potential to mix up the order. Even when a pit stop goes smoothly, exactly where an F1 driver rejoins the race after a pit stop is a huge factor in who ends up winning the race.
MotoGP mostly does not have pit stops (though I'm aware there are exceptions). Thus, the random element is lost.
Also, in F1, safety cars (and how well teams alter their strategy when a safety car event happens, specifically with respect to pitting) are a huge factor that can completely upend a race. And I definitely like this aspect of F1.
This is also one of the reasons why I dislike Formula-E so much, as they have no pit stops and go the whole race on one set of tires. And all the cars are the same. And the guy that crosses the line with no juice left in his battery is basically the winner. Boring.
MotoGP mostly does not have pit stops (though I'm aware there are exceptions). Thus, the random element is lost.
Also, in F1, safety cars (and how well teams alter their strategy when a safety car event happens, specifically with respect to pitting) are a huge factor that can completely upend a race. And I definitely like this aspect of F1.
This is also one of the reasons why I dislike Formula-E so much, as they have no pit stops and go the whole race on one set of tires. And all the cars are the same. And the guy that crosses the line with no juice left in his battery is basically the winner. Boring.
In a sense there are two races in every MotoGP race: the first half, and the second half when the rubber is in dire straits, cornering is frantic, and like you said: pit stops are not an option, you just go all out, or highside trying.