If you change the primary drive sprocket on a Honda CB 500 X from a 15 tooth to a 16 tooth the speedo reads correctly.
They couldn't make it accurate at the factory
eeeee bip
![]() BMW R1100RT The Problem Child Kymco Downtown 300 - I'm not the Uber BMW R1200 RT Big Red
Joined: UTC
Posts: 21027 Location: South East Great England of Britishland |
UTC
quote
If you change the primary drive sprocket on a Honda CB 500 X from a 15 tooth to a 16 tooth the speedo reads correctly.
They couldn't make it accurate at the factory |
|
UTC
quote
SteelBytes wrote: and a little extra: phones apps don't usually use pure gps. instead they report based on a combination of gps and info from nearby cell towers and wifi etc. this complicates the whole story These include Gaia, Locus Pro, OsmPro+, Scenic and more point-to-point options. Advrider has a number of threads on this. Map detail is far superior. Me personally, literally thousands of motorcycle and 4 wheel miles using them. One downside is screen sensitivity with gloves on, or lack there of. A stylus works and can be tethered. Still not as good as motorcycle GPS units. |
|
UTC
quote
My Speedo is optimistic.
![]() Umm, meant my speedo. I just ride with the flow of traffic anyway, whatever the speed. |
![]() UTC
Veni, Vidi, Posti
2019 GTS300 HPE SuperTech 67,000km
Joined: UTC
Posts: 6843 Location: Batmania aka Melbourne, Aus |
|
Veni, Vidi, Posti
![]() 2019 GTS300 HPE SuperTech 67,000km
Joined: UTC
Posts: 6843 Location: Batmania aka Melbourne, Aus |
UTC
quote
marret wrote: One can use a phone with cellular service turned off that only uses GPS satellites. |
|
UTC
quote
SteelBytes wrote: when I say gps I mean gps not gps fused with cell tower and wifi to create a location. The main problem with pure GPS is the acquisition time. It's gotten much better over the years with some dedicated silicon-level hardware, but still not instant. And instant is what phone users generally expect, so... |
Hooked
![]() Hurricane 200X, 2020 TW 200 (sold), 2022 Liberty 150
Joined: UTC
Posts: 194 Location: North Alabama |
UTC
quote
Huh? Technology way over this old head. Seems that pretty much all 2 wheel speedos are optimistic. As has been stated above just go with traffic flow. If exact speed really mattered (has not so far) I'd look at the Garmin.
OFG |
|
UTC
quote
SteelBytes wrote: yes I know (I write android apps). as I said the gps in phones is more inaccurate then people realise. to be clear, when I say gps I mean gps not gps fused with cell tower and wifi to create a location. eg gmaps defaults to a fused source when it can but is able to fall back to pure. There could be some small number of feet error on location, but not a noticeable concern compared to the displayed map. Altitude, the Android device is inaccurate. |
|
UTC
quote
marret wrote: This may well be true, but my experience in comparing an Android phone and tablet with an in-dash Garmin GPS over thousands of miles is that it is not noticeable. Speed difference would be fractions of 1 mph as the same number is displayed. That said, I have not compared during acceleration and curves. There could be some small number of feet error on location, but not a noticeable concern compared to the displayed map. (It also depends on whether or not the phone is using the doppler-shift technique or some primitive hack for speed readings, and that isn't easy to determine casually). |
|
UTC
quote
jess wrote: Once both devices have been on for a while, it's quite possible that both phone and GPS receiver are using actual GPS satellites. But this is definitely not true for the phone when you first open the map, since it likely hasn't finished satellite acquisition yet. (It also depends on whether or not the phone is using the doppler-shift technique or some primitive hack for speed readings, and that isn't easy to determine casually). |
|
UTC
quote
jess wrote: This is a common misunderstanding of how GPS receivers calculate speed. Most people just assume the most obvious speed calculation -- the distance between two successive locations over a fixed time interval. But GPS receivers (well, most of them) use a much more clever way to calculate speed. The preferred way for a GPS receiver to calculate speed is by observing the doppler shift on the GPS carrier frequency from multiple satellites. Position is irrelevant, and therefore vertical travel is irrelevant as well. Generally speaking, GPS-based speed readings should be good to within about 1MPH. (Here's a reference if you don't believe me). One could attempt to calculate speed in the obvious way -- from successive location readings. And I'm sure some GPS receivers -- especially "soft" receivers like those in phones -- might do something like this. But this technique is considered inferior, for reasons that you've highlighted in your post. The speedo on my Primavera is 4% off. The one on my car is about 5% off. It's within specs, and not a big deal. |
|
UTC
quote
I'm getting the distinct impression that people don't actually want to know about the inner workings of GPS, judging by most of the responses.
As you wish. I'll be off to find a better way to waste my time. |
|
UTC
quote
jess wrote: I'm getting the distinct impression that people don't actually want to know about the inner workings of GPS, judging by most of the responses. As you wish. I'll be off to find a better way to waste my time. |
|
UTC
quote
BlueWasp23 wrote: Actually I've always found it very fascinating, just not the point I was making at the time. Cheers! You know what? Nevermind. I have no more fucks to give. |
|
UTC
quote
jess wrote: It was your specific post I was responding to, because it was completely off-base about how GPS speed readings actually worked. I tried to give you some better information, but... You know what? Nevermind. I'm sorry I misspoke. I am sorry I didn't cite sources. I'm sorry I didn't write a 600 page missive. I am sorry you took the wrong message from what I was saying. Mea culpa! |
|
UTC
quote
BlueWasp23 wrote: I'm sorry I misspoke. I am sorry I didn't cite sources. I'm sorry I didn't write a 600 page missive. I am sorry you took the wrong message from what I was saying. Mea culpa! You're welcome.
Positive
|
|
UTC
quote
jess wrote: I didn't take the wrong message. You put forth a completely bullshit version of how GPS speed measurements work. I corrected you. You objected that nothing is accurate, probably because you disliked being publicly corrected. You're welcome. |
|
UTC
quote
BlueWasp23 wrote: If it makes you feel better, being pedantic. Good day. You know what has an even shorter shelf life at Modern Vespa? Newbies with an attitude that don't know what they're talking about. Good day indeed. |
|
UTC
quote
jess wrote: You know what has a short shelf life at Modern Vespa? Newbies with an attitude. You know what has an even shorter shelf life at Modern Vespa? Newbies with an attitude that don't know what they're talking about. Good day indeed. There's one like you in every forum, making them a complete hellhole of assholery. Why can't people like you just leave well enough alone. Is it so damned important to you to be 100% correct that you have to alienate people? For your information, I do know how GPS works. It wasn't in my interest, nor that of anyone else here, apparently to have a lecture on how they work. I don't have the energy to type that much. I have physical issue that limit the amount of time I can stay at a keyboard. I was merely just making a point that there are errors all over the place. Who cares if I didn't get every detail 100% correct and complete? The point is that there are errors all over the place and if your speedometer is within a few percent, then it is good enough. But I can see you are the sort of person that would niggle over 0.1% error on an analog speedometer. Don't bother responding, I'm done with arguing with someone that can't see the big picture. But I know your type, you have to have the last word, so go ahead knock yourself out. Damn, there's one in every forum, every single last one of them! |
|
UTC
quote
What's funny here is that he doesn't even realize. I wasn't sure at first, but now I'm sure.
|
|
UTC
quote
jess wrote: What's funny here is that he doesn't even realize. I wasn't sure at first, but now I'm sure.
Negative
|
|
Molto Verboso
![]() '07 GTS250, '07 LX150, '81 P200E, '78 P200E, '74 VBC1, '64 V90 and 3 Ciaos
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1441 Location: Tucson, AZ |
UTC
quote
Whenever people get a wild hair about picking a fight with Jess, I get this mental picture of them yelling "Witness Me!" at their browser and then rattlecanning their mouth silver...
![]()
Highly Rated
|
|
UTC
quote
az_slynch wrote: I get this mental picture of them yelling "Witness Me!" at their browser and then rattlecanning their mouth silver... ![]() I genuinely LOL'd. |
|
Sergeant at Arms
![]() Weird 80's Vespas & Cool Vintage Lambrettas
Joined: UTC
Posts: 15081 Location: The state of insanity, SoCal |
UTC
quote
oh man... it's been a hot minute since we had a full scale melt down.
love it. can't hardly wait for the re-register to come back and tell us all how much he doesn't have time for this and doesn't care. ![]()
Positive
|
|
UTC
quote
greasy125 wrote: can't hardly wait for the re-register to come back and tell us all how much he doesn't have time for this and doesn't care. Seventy. One. |
Sergeant at Arms
![]() Weird 80's Vespas & Cool Vintage Lambrettas
Joined: UTC
Posts: 15081 Location: The state of insanity, SoCal |
UTC
quote
jess wrote: If you want to be entertained, check the Abuse Log in modtools. I count 71 attempts. Seventy. One. evidently spending all that precious keyboard time on the important activities. |
|
![]() UTC
MV Santa
GTS250, 1975 VBC, 1980 P200E cutdown
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4869 Location: Sedgwick, Kansas |
|
MV Santa
![]() GTS250, 1975 VBC, 1980 P200E cutdown
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4869 Location: Sedgwick, Kansas |
UTC
quote
jess wrote: It seems my post has been reported as a personal attack. Oh shit, I might get banned. I'll talk to him.
Positive
|
Atypical Canadian
![]() 2009 Vespa S50(LX150 motor swap), 2006 Vespa GTS250ie
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2319 Location: Toronto, Canada |
UTC
quote
Every Vespa, and most scooters and small displacement bikes tend to be about 5-10% optimistic. 10% optimistic on my Piaggio and KYMCO products for sure. For bigger liter bikes, flagship bikes, that sort of thing, you might see them much less 'off'.
Lebo wrote: You're correct. Get used to it and factor it in. I recently asked a BMW dealer if the speedos are accurate on the GS. Nope. They are a few mph off too. I just bought a second G650GS, so I can have one on each side of the ocean. When I get it on the road I'll see if it's also accurate or not. GBaby wrote: I was trying to figure out by what percentage the speedometer was "optimistic" on my motorcycle so, having nothing else to do one chilly morning, I rode around making video of the speedometer and a gps app at various speeds. Later, having nothing else to do, I got completely carried away and edited it all into a youtube video. JBacklund wrote: My phone is with me when I ride, but it's always exiled to the interior of my backpack (which I always wear these days, regardless of which machine I'm riding) along with my baseball cap. Your life, your ride. Personally if shit hits the fan, I want to be able to reach out. Bill Dog wrote: If you change the primary drive sprocket on a Honda CB 500 X from a 15 tooth to a 16 tooth the speedo reads correctly. They couldn't make it accurate at the factory BlueWasp23 wrote: Well evidently pedantic Bay Area a-holes last a long time on the shelf. Hope you are proud of yourself for sucking the fun out of an otherwise pleasant forum. There's one like you in every forum, making them a complete hellhole of assholery. Why can't people like you just leave well enough alone. Is it so damned important to you to be 100% correct that you have to alienate people? For your information, I do know how GPS works. It wasn't in my interest, nor that of anyone else here, apparently to have a lecture on how they work. I don't have the energy to type that much. I have physical issue that limit the amount of time I can stay at a keyboard. I was merely just making a point that there are errors all over the place. Who cares if I didn't get every detail 100% correct and complete? The point is that there are errors all over the place and if your speedometer is within a few percent, then it is good enough. But I can see you are the sort of person that would niggle over 0.1% error on an analog speedometer. Don't bother responding, I'm done with arguing with someone that can't see the big picture. But I know your type, you have to have the last word, so go ahead knock yourself out. Damn, there's one in every forum, every single last one of them! jess wrote: It seems my post has been reported as a personal attack. Oh shit, I might get banned. |
|
UTC
quote
adri wrote: Second one this week, look at you go! You, though -- you actually know better. Which makes yours just a futile stunt.
Positive
|
Atypical Canadian
![]() 2009 Vespa S50(LX150 motor swap), 2006 Vespa GTS250ie
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2319 Location: Toronto, Canada |
UTC
quote
jess wrote: That guy didn't know I was the admin and owned the forum. You, though -- you actually know better. Which makes yours just a futile stunt. |
|
UTC
quote
adri wrote: Just being a good forum member and reporting foul play when I see it. |
![]() UTC
Veni, Vidi, Posti
MP3 500, GTS 250 (both 2008 MY), 2013 Piaggio BV 350, 2014 Can Am Spyder RT
Joined: UTC
Posts: 7668 Location: Madison, Wisconsin |
|
Veni, Vidi, Posti
![]() MP3 500, GTS 250 (both 2008 MY), 2013 Piaggio BV 350, 2014 Can Am Spyder RT
Joined: UTC
Posts: 7668 Location: Madison, Wisconsin |
UTC
quote
jess wrote: It seems my post has been reported as a personal attack. Oh shit, I might get banned. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Molto Verboso
![]() '07 GTS250, '07 LX150, '81 P200E, '78 P200E, '74 VBC1, '64 V90 and 3 Ciaos
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1441 Location: Tucson, AZ |
UTC
quote
jess wrote: Thoroughly unconvincing. ![]()
Positive
|
|
UTC
quote
az_slynch wrote: Adri, c'mon man. Ticking the dragon's tail only worked so many times for Louis Slotin. At the current level of annoyance, I'm unlikely to ban Adri. In fact, I might bestow a title upon him!
Positive
|
OP
|
UTC
quote
jess wrote: If you want to be entertained, check the Abuse Log in modtools. I count 71 attempts. Seventy. One. |
|
UTC
quote
Sadragna wrote: Where can I find this log. The Abuse Log is a running log of everything that is automatically blocked -- things like spambots, high-bandwidth scraping, SQL injection attacks, failed logins, and attempted re-registrations by banned users. Here's a sample, with IP addresses obfuscated: ![]()
Positive
|
|
UTC
quote
All I can say is...Thanks Jess, and keep up the great work with this forum.
I'm sure I speak for many. We really appreciate your dedication.
Positive
|
Atypical Canadian
![]() 2009 Vespa S50(LX150 motor swap), 2006 Vespa GTS250ie
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2319 Location: Toronto, Canada |
UTC
quote
jess wrote: Nice Canadian reference! At the current level of annoyance, I'm unlikely to ban Adri. In fact, I might bestow a title upon him! Re: whatever the 1950s reference was earlier, wayyyy before my time. Not even sure my parents were born yet. |
Modern Vespa is the premier site for modern Vespa and Piaggio scooters. Vespa GTS300, GTS250, GTV, GT200, LX150, LXS, ET4, ET2, MP3, Fuoco, Elettrica and more.