OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
I have been reading up on 2 stroke tuning in an attempt to figure out the high CHT's with my LML/ VMC 187 engine.

Issue: High CHT's with sustained cruising at 50+ mph (350F and rising).

Piston/Cylinder: VMC Super G Traversi

Mazz 60 mm rotary crank

Stock Stella reed block-Boyesen reeds-no modifications to reed block.

22t clutch cog 22/68

SIP R2

Timings:
T=122
E=178
Squish= 1.19mm

VMC lists the timings as:
T=114
E=173

I'm wondering if these are suggested timings or just what they would be if the piston height equaled 0.

Spaco 24/24, 26/26

Pressure tested fine at build, but found a small air leak at reed block stud and exhaust stub. Air leaks never help, but these were quite small and not constant.

Tried all different combinations of jetting from the typical Bald John stack and much richer jetting with Jack 221's ongoing help. Found a number of combos where the bike ran great through the throttle range, but could never keep CHT's down at sustained 50+.

Jack suggested possibly going with a 30mm carb and better, 4 petal reed block. A reasonable consideration, but I wanted to make sure I had ruled out everything else before ditching the Si carb and autolube, especially if it didn't end up solving the problem.

Other things I thought of:

Detuning-lowering the timings

-lowering compression- though I realize that this may not accomplish much after learning what a squish band actually does.

Trying a different head. Wondering if the VMC super G Traversi is somehow a bad combo with a 60mm crank. I'm sure the long stroke rotary crank isn't helping with flow either.

Opening up/flowing the Stella reed block, carb and case including cutting the center bar. I'm not sure if this would make a big difference.

Gearing: going up to a 23t clutch cog to lower revs at highway speeds. My stock P200 engine runs way cooler. I think the gearing plays a big part.

It's a fun engine in a way that the stock 200 is not, but it's useless to me as it is now.

I will have plenty of time to work on this engine over the winter. If sidedraft carb and better reed block are really the way to go, then I can live without autolube. This engine might just find its way to the VBB eventually. I just don't like playing new parts roulette without understanding the problem.

Thanks
@gickspeed avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2460
Location: Racing Capital of the World
 
Ossessionato
@gickspeed avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2460
Location: Racing Capital of the World
UTC quote
orwell84 wrote:
I have been reading up on 2 stroke tuning in an attempt to figure out the high CHT's with my LML/ VMC 187 engine.

Issue: High CHT's with sustained cruising at 50+ mph (350F and rising).

Piston/Cylinder: VMC Super G Traversi

Mazz 60 mm rotary crank

Stock Stella reed block-Boyesen reeds-no modifications to reed block.

22t clutch cog 22/68

SIP R2

Timings:
T=122
E=178
Squish= 1.19mm

VMC lists the timings as:
T=114
E=173

I'm wondering if these are suggested timings or just what they would be if the piston height equaled 0.

Spaco 24/24, 26/26

Pressure tested fine at build, but found a small air leak at reed block stud and exhaust stub. Air leaks never help, but these were quite small and not constant.

Tried all different combinations of jetting from the typical Bald John stack and much richer jetting with Jack 221's ongoing help. Found a number of combos where the bike ran great through the throttle range, but could never keep CHT's down at sustained 50+.

Jack suggested possibly going with a 30mm carb and better, 4 petal reed block. A reasonable consideration, but I wanted to make sure I had ruled out everything else before ditching the Si carb and autolube, especially if it didn't end up solving the problem.

Other things I thought of:

Detuning-lowering the timings

-lowering compression- though I realize that this may not accomplish much after learning what a squish band actually does.

Trying a different head. Wondering if the VMC super G Traversi is somehow a bad combo with a 60mm crank. I'm sure the long stroke rotary crank isn't helping with flow either.

Opening up/flowing the Stella reed block, carb and case including cutting the center bar. I'm not sure if this would make a big difference.

Gearing: going up to a 23t clutch cog to lower revs at highway speeds. My stock P200 engine runs way cooler. I think the gearing plays a big part.

It's a fun engine in a way that the stock 200 is not, but it's useless to me as it is now.

I will have plenty of time to work on this engine over the winter. If sidedraft carb and better reed block are really the way to go, then I can live without autolube. This engine might just find its way to the VBB eventually. I just don't like playing new parts roulette without understanding the problem.

Thanks
goodness. change your gearing to 23/65. you have way too much power for that 22/68 setup. This will change several things, your running temps as well.

but yes, that LML reedblock is limiting. I've ran the BGM177 on the LML block with autolube with success, but i do think the VMC is on another level.
@108 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
V range 50s
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2427
 
Ossessionato
@108 avatar
V range 50s
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2427
UTC quote
Ignition and squish jump out to me.

Instructions say aim for 1mm +/-0.1mm, 1.19 would be on the big side and I'd aim for conservative ignition timing (bang on 18deg at wot, I'm imagining 7.5-8krpm) because you're running a Road 2.0.
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
GickSpeed wrote:
goodness. change your gearing to 23/65. you have way too much power for that 22/68 setup. This will change several things, your running temps as well.

but yes, that LML reedblock is limiting. I've ran the BGM177 on the LML block with autolube with success, but i do think the VMC is on another level.
Thank you Mr Gick. I was thinking that this kit might be more power than I bargained for especially compared to the iron Polini. I wrongly assumed that it wouldn't pull higher gearing, but it really should.
@gickspeed avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2460
Location: Racing Capital of the World
 
Ossessionato
@gickspeed avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2460
Location: Racing Capital of the World
UTC quote
yes. take that middle bar out of the reed block. I have bulk Polini reed sheets and cut my own. but i see SM sells the reed pedal and gaskets for $38.00. also, shape the reed block to match your 24mm carb.
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
108 wrote:
Ignition and squish jump out to me.

Instructions say aim for 1mm +/-0.1mm, 1.19 would be on the big side and I'd aim for conservative ignition timing (bang on 18deg at wot, I'm imagining 7.5-8krpm) because you're running a Road 2.0.
The instructions I have list the squish at 1.4 +/- .1mm and timings of:

Intake: 114*
Exhaust 173*

That's one of the reasons I was asking about port timings. There are different versions of this kit which adds to the confusion.
Forum member supplied image with no explanatory text
@chandlerman avatar
UTC

Innovator
76 Sprint V, 63 GL, 62 VBB, 05 Stella, 66 Smallstate, 66 Lammy S3
Joined: UTC
Posts: 11094
Location: Nashville

5 Days Since Last Explosion
 
Innovator
@chandlerman avatar
76 Sprint V, 63 GL, 62 VBB, 05 Stella, 66 Smallstate, 66 Lammy S3
Joined: UTC
Posts: 11094
Location: Nashville

5 Days Since Last Explosion
UTC quote
A few considerations based on my tuning adventures over the past six months or so...

First off, you have to be tuning to the use case. I ran into this when I took the Smallie out for some touring a couple months ago. I struggled to keep my temps anywhere near under control. My stoplight racing/around town tune was WAY too lean for sustained, heat-soaked riding.

I went back and re-tuned it with an eye towards heat soaked performance, then repeated that same ride a few weeks later and while it now takes longer to warm up, it will run at 50 MPH+ for as long as there's gas in the tank and the temps have yet to get above about 310F. I call that a win.

Similarly, while it wasn't deliberate on my part, I wound up de-tuning my Malossi 210 after I tore a .5mm base gasket while splitting the cases for a cruciform swap. I decided to just roll with the lower timings and tighter squish band (I think it's now 0.8mm). While I lost some power, the thing still has plenty of oomph for around town, but the temps never go above 300.

The other thing I did on the smallie was replace the flywheel fan with the Egig high-flow fan to improve cooling. I also made sure my cylinder shrouds were nice n' tight at the same time. I think that also made a difference, though I haven't swapped back to stock to be sure.

Finally, as already noted, that stock Stella reed block is like putting a cocktail straw into a Big Gulp in terms of ability to move air. You should seriously consider removing the center bar and opening it up. That'll make a big difference (I think I calculated over 20% increase in opening size once upon a time) in flow, which in turn will allow you to actually get mixture into the cylinder at higher RPM's. I don't *know* that will make a difference, but I strongly suspect it will improve your temperature issues, especially at higher RPM's.
@108 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
V range 50s
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2427
 
Ossessionato
@108 avatar
V range 50s
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2427
UTC quote
orwell84 wrote:
The instructions I have list the squish at 1.4 +/- .1mm and timings of:

Intake: 114*
Exhaust 173*

That's one of the reasons I was asking about port timings. There are different versions of this kit which adds to the confusion.
Ah… if that's the instructions in the box then I'd go with that.

Below is the kit I thought you had.

But then why are you at 1.19mm when the instructions suggest 1.4mm?

1.4mm makes more sense for an engine to be used on the road.
Forum member supplied image with no explanatory text
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
108 wrote:
Ah… if that's the instructions in the box then I'd go with that.

Below is the kit I thought you had.

But then why are you at 1.19mm when the instructions suggest 1.4mm?

1.4mm makes more sense for an engine to be used on the road.
I think it is the same kit as far as I can tell.

CM:

I agree with you about tuning for purpose. As it is, it would be an excellent city bike. It's great on back roads too.

Detuning makes sense. It would be easy enough to lower the timings a little.

I think taller gearing would help a lot too. If I went with the 65 primary, I would have a choice of clutch cogs to fine tune it further. I think the tall gearing is one reason the the 200 runs so much cooler. I definitely don't want it to ride like the 200, but I would gladly trade off some of the revvy fun for something in between.

I have a spare reed block so in case I screw it up…Opening it up is certainly worth a try. While I am doing that and have the cases open, I could at least flow the case a little and match the transfers. I would want to do that anyway if switching to a side draft carb.

So that's the plan:

Adjust timings
65 primary
Flow case and reed block

Switch to side draft carb and real reed block if none of the above works.

Thanks!
@roland87 avatar
UTC

Molto Verboso
'13 LML Star 200, '81 50 Special, '81 P 150 X, '87 PK 50 Nuova, '84 PK 50 S
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1498
Location: Ukraine. Kyiv.
 
Molto Verboso
@roland87 avatar
'13 LML Star 200, '81 50 Special, '81 P 150 X, '87 PK 50 Nuova, '84 PK 50 S
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1498
Location: Ukraine. Kyiv.
UTC quote
Both named Super G but ... aluminium or cast iron? 🤨 🤪
Forum member supplied image with no explanatory text
Forum member supplied image with no explanatory text
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
roland87 wrote:
Both named Super G but ... aluminium or cast iron? 🤨 🤪
It's cast iron.
@roland87 avatar
UTC

Molto Verboso
'13 LML Star 200, '81 50 Special, '81 P 150 X, '87 PK 50 Nuova, '84 PK 50 S
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1498
Location: Ukraine. Kyiv.
 
Molto Verboso
@roland87 avatar
'13 LML Star 200, '81 50 Special, '81 P 150 X, '87 PK 50 Nuova, '84 PK 50 S
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1498
Location: Ukraine. Kyiv.
UTC quote
orwell84 wrote:
It's cast iron.
I understand mate, I have same kit.
And same b&w paper instruction.
And same electronic color version.
Maybe there is mistake and color version is for Stelvio?
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
roland87 wrote:
I understand mate, I have same kit.
And same b&w paper instruction.
And same electronic color version.
Maybe there is mistake and color version is for Stelvio?
Maybe the b/w is a revision?
@roland87 avatar
UTC

Molto Verboso
'13 LML Star 200, '81 50 Special, '81 P 150 X, '87 PK 50 Nuova, '84 PK 50 S
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1498
Location: Ukraine. Kyiv.
 
Molto Verboso
@roland87 avatar
'13 LML Star 200, '81 50 Special, '81 P 150 X, '87 PK 50 Nuova, '84 PK 50 S
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1498
Location: Ukraine. Kyiv.
UTC quote
Forum member supplied image with no explanatory text
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
roland87 wrote:
Ah, the aluminum port version
@ginch avatar
UTC

Veni, Vidi, Posti
74 Super, 75 Super, PX project, LML off-roader and '66 Blue Badge Smallframe
Joined: UTC
Posts: 8956
Location: Victoria, Australia
 
Veni, Vidi, Posti
@ginch avatar
74 Super, 75 Super, PX project, LML off-roader and '66 Blue Badge Smallframe
Joined: UTC
Posts: 8956
Location: Victoria, Australia
UTC quote
As 108 asked, what's your ignition timing?

It would be interesting to see if the temp keeps going up. 350 is not so bad to my way of thinking.

Couple of quotes from Patrick -
oopsclunkthud wrote:
On the cannonball in 2006 I ran my smallframe WOT 3500 miles with the CHT between 350-450F and the EGT between 1100-1250F.

Put a total of 10,000 miles on that engine under the same conditions with zero heat related issues. Under side of the piston has no carbon, skirt is clean, no detonation...

Not sure where anyone is pulling this 250F CHT target value from.
oopsclunkthud wrote:
I've run WOT days on end with a CHT limit of 225C (450F), but I also run an EGT and keep it at a limit of 675C (1250F)

Those are steady state temps, full speed tucked hour after hour. If the temp is not settling in at those temps or below, then the jetting is too lean for the riding conditions.

http://oopsclunkthud.com/tuning/gauges.pdf
@chandlerman avatar
UTC

Innovator
76 Sprint V, 63 GL, 62 VBB, 05 Stella, 66 Smallstate, 66 Lammy S3
Joined: UTC
Posts: 11094
Location: Nashville

5 Days Since Last Explosion
 
Innovator
@chandlerman avatar
76 Sprint V, 63 GL, 62 VBB, 05 Stella, 66 Smallstate, 66 Lammy S3
Joined: UTC
Posts: 11094
Location: Nashville

5 Days Since Last Explosion
UTC quote
350F was the red line temp for cast iron cylinders with an under-the-plug CHT.

I recall Jack once saying that 320F was his target for max temps and a chart of the impact of heat on aluminum cylinders & pistons out of an aviation manual that Voo doo once shared indicated that 420F was the temp at which it started materially impacting the life of the cylinder. Obviously, all alloy mixes are not the same, but those are data points that stuck with me.

Personally, I still like to keep my temps under 350 or so with the sender tapped into the head, even though I know that's probably low. I also find that a well-tuned motor will tend to run under that anyway, so even if that's not the safety limit, if I'm running hotter, there's something going on that needs further investigation, ideally before I need to call someone to come pick me up. Razz emoticon
@subetherbass avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
1997 Italjet Formula 125, 2 matching N.Z. '69 VBC Super, 177cc Racer, VespaCross Bodge, Puch SRA150, Piaggio Zip 100! & others
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4939
Location: Australa, Mate
 
Ossessionato
@subetherbass avatar
1997 Italjet Formula 125, 2 matching N.Z. '69 VBC Super, 177cc Racer, VespaCross Bodge, Puch SRA150, Piaggio Zip 100! & others
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4939
Location: Australa, Mate
UTC quote
Where is the sensor?
Plug or bolt? They have very different readings
UTC

Jet Eye Master
PX221 MHR, PX200 O tuned, PX181 M1XL, PX125 O tuned and some motorbikes
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4862
Location: London UK
 
Jet Eye Master
PX221 MHR, PX200 O tuned, PX181 M1XL, PX125 O tuned and some motorbikes
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4862
Location: London UK
UTC quote
chandlerman wrote:
350F was the red line temp for cast iron cylinders with an under-the-plug CHT.

I recall Jack once saying that 320F was his target for max temps and a chart of the impact of heat on aluminum cylinders & pistons out of an aviation manual that Voo doo once shared indicated that 420F was the temp at which it started materially impacting the life of the cylinder. Obviously, all alloy mixes are not the same, but those are data points that stuck with me.

Personally, I still like to keep my temps under 350 or so with the sender tapped into the head, even though I know that's probably low. I also find that a well-tuned motor will tend to run under that anyway, so even if that's not the safety limit, if I'm running hotter, there's something going on that needs further investigation, ideally before I need to call someone to come pick me up. Razz emoticon
I've said this plenty before but just to recap. As I see it, when jetted for road use, the temperature will be less than 320F under the plug. The cylinder can run much hotter but hotter is less powerful, slower and one issue away from cylinder destruction.
As a 177 has basically the same cooling as a 200, the correctly jetted temperature is even lower, less than 280F.
Something is going on with this build. Can only be the small reed block. Everything else is like usual, which we know works.

EDIT: Even before any de-tune 122/178 is already low for port timing, so it's not that.
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
Jack221 wrote:
I've said this plenty before but just to recap. As I see it, when jetted for road use, the temperature will be less than 320F under the plug. The cylinder can run much hotter but hotter is less powerful, slower and one issue away from cylinder destruction.
As a 177 has basically the same cooling as a 200, the correctly jetted temperature is even lower, less than 280F.
Something is going on with this build. Can only be the small reed block. Everything else is like usual, which we know works.

EDIT: Even before any de-tune 122/178 is already low for port timing, so it's not that.
Thanks Jack.

I agree, the reed block is a bottleneck. The question is whether opening it up would be sufficient. It still has the center bar and I haven't touched the carb box and carb.

I also agree with Mr. Gick that taller gearing would help. You are spot on about 200 temps. 280F is as hot as it ever got lugging in 4th up a hill.

CHT was measured with a screw in sensor and a plug sensor at the same time. When the engine gets really heat soaked, they end up pretty close.
@ginch avatar
UTC

Veni, Vidi, Posti
74 Super, 75 Super, PX project, LML off-roader and '66 Blue Badge Smallframe
Joined: UTC
Posts: 8956
Location: Victoria, Australia
 
Veni, Vidi, Posti
@ginch avatar
74 Super, 75 Super, PX project, LML off-roader and '66 Blue Badge Smallframe
Joined: UTC
Posts: 8956
Location: Victoria, Australia
UTC quote
Ignition timing?
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
Ginch wrote:
Ignition timing?
I set it to 18* and tried it at 17* too.
@kowalski avatar
UTC

Addicted
2005 Stellalossi 177 Fe
Joined: UTC
Posts: 612
Location: MA
 
Addicted
@kowalski avatar
2005 Stellalossi 177 Fe
Joined: UTC
Posts: 612
Location: MA
UTC quote
This is a long shot but did you ever try a BE4 mixer? Fifty mph should be about 5,300 rpm on your gearing. I don't know exactly where in the rev range the different sections of a given mixer tube come on line but I think a BE4 would richen things up quite a bit around that 5,300 rpm point.
@108 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
V range 50s
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2427
 
Ossessionato
@108 avatar
V range 50s
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2427
UTC quote
If the squish isn't right, temps will go up.

Smaller squish doesn't mean cooler temps.
UTC

parallelogramerist
Joined: UTC
Posts: 5561
 
parallelogramerist
Joined: UTC
Posts: 5561
UTC quote
higher compression will create higher temps as well.
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
I could certainly raise the squish from 1.19 to 1.4.

We did try the BE4 briefly. It did seem to help with mid-range CHT's but made it harder to get it to splutter when revving out.

I could try jetting again after opening up the reed block and case and switching to the 65 primary.

At that point, I could switch to a real reed block and side draft carb if the above changes don't help.
⬆️    About 5 months elapsed    ⬇️
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
Seems like every time I look up the specs for this kit, the squish gets bigger.
I wonder why. 1.8-2mm seems like a big jump. But maybe there's a reason.

Squish is currently at 1.19 on my engine as it sits on the bench. A .5mm head spacer I made would put it at 1.69. I'm going to give it a try.
Forum member supplied image with no explanatory text
UTC

Jet Eye Master
PX221 MHR, PX200 O tuned, PX181 M1XL, PX125 O tuned and some motorbikes
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4862
Location: London UK
 
Jet Eye Master
PX221 MHR, PX200 O tuned, PX181 M1XL, PX125 O tuned and some motorbikes
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4862
Location: London UK
UTC quote
orwell84 wrote:
Seems like every time I look up the specs for this kit, the squish gets bigger.
I wonder why. 1.8-2mm seems like a big jump. But maybe there's a reason.

Squish is currently at 1.19 on my engine as it sits on the bench. A .5mm head spacer I made would put it at 1.69. I'm going to give it a try.
The bigger the squish clearance, the lower the peak power. Many (not all) companies tend to state the lowest risk options. Optimal clearance at this cc for peak power would be 0.6-0.8mm.
As you have very little interest in high rpm and peak power, set the clearance at 2.0mm and forget about it.
@kowalski avatar
UTC

Addicted
2005 Stellalossi 177 Fe
Joined: UTC
Posts: 612
Location: MA
 
Addicted
@kowalski avatar
2005 Stellalossi 177 Fe
Joined: UTC
Posts: 612
Location: MA
UTC quote
Scooter Center has a link to official looking instructions. Calls for 1 mm squish + or - .1. 2 mm is nuts.
@108 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
V range 50s
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2427
 
Ossessionato
@108 avatar
V range 50s
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2427
UTC quote
No harm in trying. You'd be surprised…
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
Jack221 wrote:
The bigger the squish clearance, the lower the peak power. Many (not all) companies tend to state the lowest risk options. Optimal clearance at this cc for peak power would be 0.6-0.8mm.
As you have very little interest in high rpm and peak power, set the clearance at 2.0mm and forget about it.
You are correct. For my current needs, peak power isn't a requirement. Certainly worth revisiting to optimize sometime down the road. At this point, I'll be happy to have it pushing another functioning bike.

I'll give it a shot. Thanks!
@charlieman22 avatar
UTC

Nedminder
62 VBB1T Round Tail W/ leaner sidecar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4173
Location: california
 
Nedminder
@charlieman22 avatar
62 VBB1T Round Tail W/ leaner sidecar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4173
Location: california
UTC quote
Quote:
CHT was measured with a screw in sensor and a plug sensor at the same time. When the engine gets really heat soaked, they end up pretty close.
Did the statute of limitations run out on responding to this?

Assuming no (I've been known to blow a red light or two) this doesn't match my experience at all.

Your on iron so it won't be as happy to go as high as aluminum.

On my aluminum, when too lean, jetted for light to light screaming, it will climb over 400 when put under long heat soaked duress. When jetted a bit more plump, it settles in around 365/370 and will sit there with strong head winds climbing long hills.

In head.
I've never seen more than 330 under plug.
Surprised ur getting same readings head and plug.

Interested to see what happens when u open up read.
Small leak at block is no bueno.
I would make one change at a time - and start here - ensuring seal and opening up the block.
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
charlieman22 wrote:
Did the statute of limitations run out on responding to this?

Assuming no (I've been known to blow a red light or two) this doesn't match my experience at all.

Your on iron so it won't be as happy to go as high as aluminum.

On my aluminum, when too lean, jetted for light to light screaming, it will climb over 400 when put under long heat soaked duress. When jetted a bit more plump, it settles in around 365/370 and will sit there with strong head winds climbing long hills.

In head.
I've never seen more than 330 under plug.
Surprised ur getting same readings head and plug.

Interested to see what happens when u open up read.
Small leak at block is no bueno.
I would make one change at a time - and start here - ensuring seal and opening up the block.
Yes, still planning on opening up the reed block. It's been resealed and pressure tested.

Under plug readings do tend to read lower than screw in sensor, but eventually ended up in the same ball park with sustained 50+ mph. I'm surprised too.
@oopsclunkthud avatar
UTC

Banned
3:5
Joined: UTC
Posts: 9060
Location: San Francisco
 
Banned
@oopsclunkthud avatar
3:5
Joined: UTC
Posts: 9060
Location: San Francisco
UTC quote
without EGT the picture is incomplete and it's all guess work
OP
@orwell84 avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
 
Ossessionato
@orwell84 avatar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 3736
Location: northern New York
UTC quote
oopsclunkthud wrote:
without EGT the picture is incomplete and it's all guess work
It's definitely on my list of avionics upgrades.
@chandlerman avatar
UTC

Innovator
76 Sprint V, 63 GL, 62 VBB, 05 Stella, 66 Smallstate, 66 Lammy S3
Joined: UTC
Posts: 11094
Location: Nashville

5 Days Since Last Explosion
 
Innovator
@chandlerman avatar
76 Sprint V, 63 GL, 62 VBB, 05 Stella, 66 Smallstate, 66 Lammy S3
Joined: UTC
Posts: 11094
Location: Nashville

5 Days Since Last Explosion
UTC quote
What's the compression on this thing?
@charlieman22 avatar
UTC

Nedminder
62 VBB1T Round Tail W/ leaner sidecar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4173
Location: california
 
Nedminder
@charlieman22 avatar
62 VBB1T Round Tail W/ leaner sidecar
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4173
Location: california
UTC quote
Data is always good.

For time being - the question I have is - why so hot with so little load.
Frankly, 50MPH should be a walk in the park - even with your fan, your gearing, your carb, etc. etc. etc.

In simple terms, if throwing a larger main jet on it is not cooling you down - then likely something else is amiss.
Will be interested to see how things go after the reed block opening.
Perhaps this is bottle necking your system.
If so - it should have an immediate and significant effect.

Question: Where is your throttle position when you are cruising and seeing the temps climb?
It can be REALLY hard to tell - so I built this beauty of a bodgery to measure mine.
Was super instructive.
Obviously got caught in the rain... but you get the idea.
Obviously got caught in the rain... but you get the idea.
Hose clamp and welding rod.  length of rod gives a lot more precision in reading at speed.  Turns out I was heating up at 1/2 throttle - not 3/4 (which I had assumed)
Hose clamp and welding rod. length of rod gives a lot more precision in reading at speed. Turns out I was heating up at 1/2 throttle - not 3/4 (which I had assumed)
@bajarob avatar
UTC

Molto Verboso
1961 VS5T, 1981 P200E, 2003 Malaguti F12 Phantom,Rigid Frame Chopper, 2001 Harley FXDXT
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1625
Location: Ventura, CA
 
Molto Verboso
@bajarob avatar
1961 VS5T, 1981 P200E, 2003 Malaguti F12 Phantom,Rigid Frame Chopper, 2001 Harley FXDXT
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1625
Location: Ventura, CA
UTC quote
orwell84 wrote:
It's definitely on my list of avionics upgrades.
Avionics?! You need me to sign off your work? We should do a new weight and balance when you're done.😉😁
UTC

Jet Eye Master
PX221 MHR, PX200 O tuned, PX181 M1XL, PX125 O tuned and some motorbikes
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4862
Location: London UK
 
Jet Eye Master
PX221 MHR, PX200 O tuned, PX181 M1XL, PX125 O tuned and some motorbikes
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4862
Location: London UK
UTC quote
charlieman22 wrote:
Data is always good.

For time being - the question I have is - why so hot with so little load.
Frankly, 50MPH should be a walk in the park - even with your fan, your gearing, your carb, etc. etc. etc.

In simple terms, if throwing a larger main jet on it is not cooling you down - then likely something else is amiss.
Will be interested to see how things go after the reed block opening.
Perhaps this is bottle necking your system.
If so - it should have an immediate and significant effect.

Question: Where is your throttle position when you are cruising and seeing the temps climb?
It can be REALLY hard to tell - so I built this beauty of a bodgery to measure mine.
Was super instructive.
50mph should be a walk in the park. About 1/3 throttle, buzzing along steady at 250f (plug) is nice.

Looks like a Victorian solution. I use snopake. Does the job and wipes off with petrol afterwards. Seems too simple now 😕
UTC

Jet Eye Master
PX221 MHR, PX200 O tuned, PX181 M1XL, PX125 O tuned and some motorbikes
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4862
Location: London UK
 
Jet Eye Master
PX221 MHR, PX200 O tuned, PX181 M1XL, PX125 O tuned and some motorbikes
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4862
Location: London UK
UTC quote
orwell84 wrote:
You are correct. For my current needs, peak power isn't a requirement. Certainly worth revisiting to optimize sometime down the road. At this point, I'll be happy to have it pushing another functioning bike.

I'll give it a shot. Thanks!
It will be better next time

Modern Vespa is the premier site for modern Vespa and Piaggio scooters. Vespa GTS300, GTS250, GTV, GT200, LX150, LXS, ET4, ET2, MP3, Fuoco, Elettrica and more.

Buy Me A Coffee
 

Shop on Amazon with Modern Vespa

Modern Vespa is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com


All Content Copyright 2005-2025 by Modern Vespa.
All Rights Reserved.


[ Time: 0.0287s ][ Queries: 4 (0.0062s) ][ live ][ 330 ][ ThingOne ]