old as dirt wrote:
so it was just plain gerry rigged from the get go.
I can't say without knowing all the facts. from people I know it seems like a little of column A (engineering), a little of column B (inspection) and a lot of column C (oversight)
engineers are saying it's fine, it just needs inspected more. tech says it shouldn't need to be inspected that often, build it better. parts supplier says don't look at us, it passed QC. mfgr says, that's the only one that's happened to out of [blank], and you guys handle the final assembly *deftly wipes hands*.
the only thing everybody seems to agree on is that the
structure didn't fail (ie. the door-- which technically isn't even a door-- didn't buckle), it is something in the attachment. so that why engineering, A&P and mfgr are all standing around doing the Spiderman pointing gif.