DiBiasio wrote:
I always question the unspoken agenda lurking behind promoting press devoted to the downsides of EVs. Some cars don't respond well to cold temps. Got it.
I see this a lot in the press. I'm not anti-press by any stretch of the imagination, but I am acutely aware that the press pushes more narrative than factual reporting, and I'm more than a bit uncomfortable with that. Every story is pitched with a specific angle, and then the facts kind of bend to fit that narrative. Or worse, the facts that don't fit are just ignored.
I've found this narrative-disguised-as-journalism to be especially unnerving when I've been dead center in the middle of a story that was being reported and had a very good grasp of the actual facts. In every single instance, the press got
major pieces of the story wrong.
This was especially true during my very long career at Apple. The amount of manufactured narrative pushed by the tech press is off the charts when it comes to Apple. And the amount of things reported about Apple that are just plain false is astounding.
In the EV world -- and as an EV owner -- I see an endless stream of "gotcha" articles about the potential shortcomings of EVs, range anxiety, cold-weather, battery fires, lithium and cobalt mining, rare earth materials from China, battery recycling, and on and on and on. These endless stories basically amount to scare tactics, to what end I don't quite fathom.
It's little better than concern trolling. I'd like to think the press was above that.