I never cease to be amazed by the size differences of Vespas on scoot meets. I álso never stop to take notes or what
I do take photos and try get the relative sizes in perspective. Yet when back home I look up the sizes in the specs., those hardly ever represent the differences between the real things.
I mean 100 mm wheelbase and 60 mm seat hight is only 10 cm longer and 6 cm taller, so not all thát much is it but the real scoots next to each other dó differ a lot
Taking my P200E as my reference, the T5 and TX are significantly larger, in the steel again more so than the specs. on paper indicate. Following wide frame, small frame, large frame nomenclature, they should be labeled tall frame imo.
Now to my ´problem´. How small are smallies?
The later PK XL models look about on par with my P-E yet according to specs they are about as much smaller as the T5/TX are larger.
And then the latest PKs áre about same size as my P-E.
Next the earlier PK models dó look smaller and the sixties smallies look like miniature scoots!
The specified weights are not much better because of wheel/tyre sizes, battery or not, glove box or not etc.
And then we get to the 50 cc models. The Special is a real small PK-family design aimed at a younger public but when you get to the nineties 50N you have more of a PK-lárgy outsizing my P-E.
Why this musing?
1. I like the diminutive stature of the smallest Vespas
2. I appreciate the sophistication of the PKs
and cannot define the sweet spot