wentwest wrote:
The answers cover this well. I split often on the freeway and in local traffic on the streets. Two very different sets of reality. On the freeway it's very dangerous to split when there's an open space in either lane that a car from the other lane can quickly slip in to. You don't want to be there when someone jumps over a lane.
In city traffic I often end up riding between the single lane of traffic and the parked cars. There you really have to be on the lookout for cars coming out of parking spots, cars jumping into an open spot, people getting out of the car they just parked, driveways and cars that turn a corner in front of you. Also pedestrians who step off the curb without looking for you. It's lots more challenging than on a freeway. No one seems to notice turn signals. If you have 4 way flashers, use them.
In the state that has allowed "lane-sharing" the longest, "riding between the single lane of traffic and the parked cars" is actually not legal. Lane-splitting is allowed only between two lanes going in the same direction. California AB51 defines lane-splitting as: "driving a motorcycle … that has two wheels in contact with the ground, between rows of stopped or moving vehicles in the same lane, including on both divided and undivided streets, roads, or highways." Here, "in the same lane" means that, technically, we're not allowed to straddle the line between the lanes. This is not enforced, and I see law enforcement motorcycle officers doing this all the time.
Also, "California law does not generally permit the use of hazard lights while a vehicle is in motion. Under California Vehicle Code (CVC) 25250"
https://tinyurl.com/27mf3glr
Personally, I have no objection to to these two practices.
Shortly after this law was passed, I was pulled over by the CHP for lane-splitting on my MP3. When I explained that the MP3 wasn't technically a three-wheeler (like a Can-Am Spyder, for example), but has a dual front wheel he wished me well and off we rode.