Noblekain wrote:
TheO.Z.
I hear you, and I get the fears that you harbor against newbies to the vintage arena.
No, you don't. Because you're kind of making them up here. I'm by no means a vintage snob, I have no interest in keeping anyone out of the "vintage arena", and I'm a huge proponent of people from the "modern" scene entering the "vintage" arena. I started riding on a modern vespa and have slowly transitioned, as my mechanical skills have evolved and bettered, into a broader swath of 2-wheelers. This includes vintage vespas, which I have an affinity for from an aesthetic and historical sense.
My other bikes speak this story: I've had my GT200, I've had an Aprilia Atlantic 500, a Honda Elite 250, a Honda 599, an MP3 500 and my little small frame Vespa 90.
Quote:
While 3 of my questions do lean toward your perception of my interests in the bikes I chose, really the only one you should be concerned over is #3... and I personally don't think it's a poor question. It IS important to know what the general feeling of the community is regarding vintage models. Keep in mind, I don't care much about what others think of ME... but what they think of the bikes does play a role in the type of project I'll begin. What better way to judge the likelyhood of my feelings about the end result, than to pick the brains of the insiders? If I'm to enjoy my vintage bike (having not had the opportunity to ride one of that model myself previously) the best I have to go off of is the opinions of others who HAVE experienced the bikes.
Absolutely. If you need a starting point, there's no better way than to ask. There are two different questions though, that I see:
1) what's the most valuable bike I can possibly buy
2) what's the
best bike for someone who's never owned a bike that's vastly different from any current modern offering to jump in to.
The answers there are pretty much entirely mutually exclusive.
Quote:
As for choosing the Rally, I chose it partially for that exact reason... everyone I've talked to, or written to, who owns one, or HAS owned one, loves it. The other reasons are the ones I already mentioned... availability of parts, availability of information, and reliability (I'm a programmer, not a mechanic so I need something a little less fragile). Additionally, I want something that's "fast".
Rallies are great bikes, yes. They're fast, quick, reliable, much of it is interchangable with a P... over all solid. I suggest riding one, though, before you simply go for "fast" as a bike. A Rally at 65 feels different than a GT/GTS/LX/any modern bike at 65. You may change your mind about "fast" the second you find out how "useful" that front brake is.
Quote:
I currently own a 2008 LX150 (had it since April) and I ride it almost everyday to work. I love it. My brother in law only owns vintage (and is the reason I got into Vespas in the first place). However, all his rides are 2 stroke small frames (and one Lambretta, which is actually my favorite of his, but is currently not running reliably). Anyway, I like the idea of restoring one myself, but a small frame is just silly (I'm a very tall person). Therefore, I can't even use my brother-in-law for information as to the bikes quality... I mean he KNOWS of them, and about them... but not from personal restore experience. And he's pretty adamant that 2 stroke engines are far different, and thus he can't tell me too much.
I'm glad you ride your bike every day. That's a good thing to hear - these bikes are meant to be daily commuters that people beat the crap out of. An LX150 is a perfect choice for that. Prior to beating the living crap out of my GT on Cannonball, I rode that thing every damned day, rain or shine, and never regretted a second of it. From my perspective now, my big goal is to get that GT running again. I applaud your constant use of the bike, and contend that among all of the benefits of a modern, that's one of them.
A Rally might be a different beast than you're expecting, though.
Quote:
So yeah, I chose a Rally because it fits all my criteria. Fast, reliable, part availability, information availability, and yes... people like them as their ride, which means I likely will too.
Yes, they're reliable, for a vintage. And provided you have the mechanical skill, can be very reliable over time. At the same time, you mention above you're a programmer, and not a mechanic. That'll be a hurdle to get over - you'll have to learn the delicate art of potentially changing a popped tire on the side of the road, or a clutch or throttle cable, or any host of other things.
Reliability between vintage and modern bikes mean greatly different things. Be aware of that.
Quote:
As for the SX200... I just think its a sweet looking bike. Have a ridden one? Nope. But it sure looks sweet... and I figured since they imported so many, I'd have an easier time with it than some other models I was looking for. I do realize they're shipping so many overseas, but I thought I'd still have a good shot at one if I watched for it.
uhh, why do you think so many SX's were imported? As I recall, the total # produced
ever was some 10K, which is far less than the # of Rally 200s. A crappy or mediocre condition SX will often go for $5-7k, a good condition for $10k, for that very reason.
Quote:
We all start somewhere. I don't believe in any arbitrary rules of, "You're new, so you gotta pay your dues". I'm the type of guy who will refuse to buy an item I want (even if its a good deal) until I can get EXACTLY what I want. Why? because in the end, even if I pay more, I'll be far happier with my decision and I'll be proud of the end result.
I totally agree - we all start somewhere. But what you don't get here is I'm not saying "You gotta pay your dues". No one has ever said that, so that's clearly a hang-up you're bringing to the table on your own.
Let me phrase it this way: it's the equivalent of buying a GSX-R as your first bike because everyone says they're great. GSX-Rs are great bikes, yes, but they're also litre bikes that will kill the living shit out of someone who doesn't yet even know the nuances of shifting on a motorcycle. Thats' why often I'd recommend a middleweight - an FZ-6 or maybe even a Honda Hawk if you can find one. You gotta start somewhere, but if you don't know what it is exactly that you're getting yourself into, you probably should take a baby step in. Vintages are the same way, especially if you're looking for something "fast". You might find yourself learning very quickly on the freeway that a vintage bike's brakes work
very differently than you expect after running an LX for a while, day in and day out.
In that case, I'd say a P is a great first step, or a Stella. They're tanks. They're reliable as can be. With that first step, you can then decide if either restoring or riding a vintage bike is really what you want to do. If it is, then you sell the P and buy your next bike with the comfort of knowing what you're going to get into. This is the exact same advice I'd give someone buying a sports bike for the first time: sit down on a Ninja 500 first, and figure out if it's what you want before you jump on the GSX-R and decide that's the bike for you.
Does that have anything to do with "paying dues"? No. That simply has something to do with making the
right vehicle choice for what you want. Sometimes that isn't necessarily the prettiest, rarest, and coolest thing out there. If you're not sure how to fix a bike, don't know how to do it, aren't even sure you could do it (as you've mentioned, you're a programmer, and not a mechanic), why start out on something of possible incredible value you could munge up?
I say all of this as someone who's been down that exact path as yourself, and not too long ago. My small frame, while a pain in the ass to work on because it's engine is not easily accessible, is still an amazing learning process. It looks purdy, it's fun to ride around on, and ultimately, it's not too far out of my league, mechanically speaking. It's lead me to understand engines better, and gotten me to branch out to doing repairs on other bikes, and has made me less afraid of touching engines. I, too, am a technologist and not a mechanic, but I took the opportunity to learn on something that's not particularly valuable or not particularly rare
first so that at one point, when I do want to "trade up", I don't munge something that would have otherwise been meaningful. I know they're rare, and I know they're beautiful, and I don't want to trash an engine because I didn't seat the seals correctly, or total the frame because I didn't quite have an understanding of what it meant to stop the bike.
You can call that whatever you want. If you want to think of it as "paying dues", feel free - but it's probably better thought of approaching a problem with the appropriate scale of solution.
Since you're a technologist, I'll phrase it this way:
it's very possible to have a one-off business problem that gets solved with 7 lines of perl vs 300 lines of java. If you know it can be solved simply and elegantly in one way, why go the other route knowing full well that you are probably using a tool that's overkill for the job?