robotribe wrote:
1. Denser city populations
2. Smaller/narrower streets and fewer places to park
3. High fuel price/tax
Those would be my guess.
IndieJones wrote:
I think it's important to remember that most of Europe is more temperate than large chunks of the US. For instance winter in Paris or London is a lot like Portland: chilly and damp, but not snowy. And Italy quite temperate in the Southern areas like Rome.
This makes a big difference with all-year scooter commuting.
Both good insights. Even in NYC, probably the most scooter-incentived city in the US (if not scooter-friendly), sees most of the scooter riders disappear when the weather gets cooler, say under 50F degrees. Even I, who would ride any time the streets did not have snow/ice on them, have to give up at least two months of the year when there is basically always ice at street corners in the morning in my neighborhood (Manhattan-only people have it a little easier).
So even in the most appropriate place in the US to use a scooter as a primary transport, there is a lack of legal parking and roughly a quarter of the year where you can't ride.
Living in the warmer parts of the country where one could ride pretty comfortably all year round, such as the Sun Belt or the Southwest, generally involves so much long distance driving that small displacement scooters are not going to be a popular choice either.
There's also the hassle of getting a license. You have to go to the DMV, take a written test, figure out a way to take and pass a road test...
Plus as soon as you have a family you can't ride except as a solo commute, unless you have only one kid who's old enough to ride pillion (going Vietnam-style with five people on a scooter being illegal in this country).
So in addition to the limiting factors from
robotribe and
IndieJones, the target demographic for scooter riding in the US is someone who:
- Has a short-hop or intra-urban commute
- Has no kids, or grown independently mobile kids, or can afford a separate solo commuter vehicle on top of the family car(s)
- Is willing to ride about 75% of the year or less (i.e., this is not their only vehicle)
In other words, it's typically at best a useful luxury (something that makes your life more fun, easier/quicker than driving or mass transit, or slightly cheaper on the gas costs, but not really necessary), and at worst a toy for the occasional joyride.
Finally, from a cultural perspective, if you're going to meet all the above criteria, even going so far as to get a motorcycle license, why not get "a real motorcycle" (as all of us scooterists have heard at some point or other)? Especially if you're going with a Vespa that costs over $6,000 USD, at which price one could get many a 500cc-range cruiser or sportbike and get more "respect", not to mention a more comfortable highway/long-distance rider.
I do see a lot of scooters in NYC because we do have a lot of folks who fit the profile of "young urban people with disposable income, who want to look urban/hip/Euro-chic and who live, work and play without leaving the core of the city". I've seen it too in other densely populated US cities like Boston, Chicago, Washington DC. But nationwide, I think we'll only see the appeal of very cheap scooters (the Chinese imports) rise, purely for the gas mileage, and very small displacement scooters (50cc and under), for those areas where no additional license is needed for them.