s1h wrote:
What is the difference between a 100/90/10 and a 350/10 or 300/10
Its just I notice I can get 3 of the 350/10 michelins for £59 or 2 of the 100/90/10 for that price.
The link posted above gives a good explanation of what the numbers mean, but I can give you a more practical explanation of the differences. If I'm not mistaken, I believe the Cosa is intended to run on 100/90-10's. In comparison, the 3.50-10 is slightly taller in height and narrower in width. Installing a set of these will slightly raise your effective gear ratio, which will slightly reduce the rate of acceleration, but it might be able to reach a slightly higher top speed. They will also cause your speedometer and odometer to turn slower than they should, due to the larger overall circumference. The overall handling will also feel less "beefy" and a little more "squirrely" (a bit like going from a scooter to a bicycle) since it's riding on a narrower patch of rubber. You'll probably find that it corners with much less effort than you'd normally expect too, which may take some getting used to.
The 3.00-10 is 1/2 inch narrower than the 3.50-10, so the results would be even more dramatic than what I described above, and I wouldn't recommend installing them on the Cosa. Those are meant for Vespa smallframes, not full frame Vespas. If you were to install them, it would feel very much like riding a bicycle, and they'd definitely wear out much more quickly.
So, if money is really tight and your choice is between the old bald tires or new 3.50-10's, or if you want to try them as an experiment, you could get by with them, but you should expect some differences in handling and performance. Otherwise, you'll probably be more comfortable riding on the proper 100/90-10's. Hope this helps!