Quote:
There is absolutely NO reason that a cell phone should be used in an operational auto.
Please to strongly disagree...
So when I was in a ambulance this spring with a busted leg, I shouldn't have tried to contact my family as to where they could find me until I thought they had come home?
When the area flooded a few years ago and I was trying to get to my daughter home she shouldn't have tried to call me to let me know where I could get her. I should have just turned off the cell phone and driven aimlessly with my fingers crossed?
When I get stuck in a traffic jam on the interstate and I can't get to my business to open in time (which means families are standing outside the door, waiting) I shouldn't call the shop next door and have them post a small note saying I'm on my way?
Just a few weeks back I saw a little girl run in front of a car and was struck. I should have waited and driven down a few blocks until maybe I could pull over and find a safe place to call 911? (BTW...she's OK.)
Look, I hate people talking endlessly on cell phones while driving...I really, really, do. I double-hate texting while driving. Still, I keep the cell phone on in my car when I am traveling or commuting in case it is
needed. I don't dial...if the voice dial doesn't work (and on those earlier Chocolate phones the voice recognition is
awful) I wait.
When the phone rings, I look at the ID and screen my calls. If it's from my home or an employee, then I pick it up...if not, it goes to the voice message.
When I do have to answer the phone, I use a hands free device. I'm still amazed at the number of people who will spring large amounts for a road tank but can't shake enough change loose for a Bluetooth device.
In other words, I
choose to behave responsibly.
But what is scarier are people who can't discriminate between any given value of behavior and assume that all similar behaviors be lumped together as "bad" or "wrong." For example, texting while driving with one's head up one's ass being regarded as the same as answering a call from one's wife saying the furnace just exploded. This type of low-level thinking is the same thing that leads to little children being expelled from school for drawing a cowboy with a dreaded gun because its still a gun, or a teenager being expelled for having an aspirin because it is still a drug. It's the stuff petty bureaucrats come up with so they can avoid the work of actually being responsible for making an intelligent decision.
And scarier than road-ranging idiots are people who think that government should micro-manage behavior of everyone else. Aren't they trying to pass a law against body odor somewhere now?
For the record: I'm all for a law against
drivers texting while driving. I'm also all for a law requiring
drivers to use a hands free device while on the road.
However, to say there is
absolutely no reason to use a cell phone in the car is wrong. And to say that all problems can be solved by making laws for bureaucrats to enforce will always come back to haunt. (Wait until someone decides they don't like something
you do.)
The point of the whole film, I think, was to make this behavior
unfashionable.. Socially unaceptable. When a normal person, especially a young person, regards a behavior as no longer being cool, you can betcherass that they will do anything to avoid it.
And as for those who just don't give a damn, no law, no reason, will work anyway.
No amount of legislation will cure an asshole. You end up making a criminal out of good people who want to know why their elderly parent might be calling them while the idiots persist in well, being idiots.
And I need another cup of coffee.
PS: For the records, I am not trying to disparage any fellow MV here...I don't work that way. I'm just presenting my side of a discussion. Peace out, dudes. 8)