messycoloring wrote:
RedOrGreen wrote:
Adobe Lightroom. I've got about 24,000 pictures in my catalog at the moment, and Lightroom is the best way I've ever found to handle them efficiently.
I've looked at Lightroom,
how is it with keyword searches?
Fabulous. It really has some excellent tools for building useful keyword trees too. For example, you can put your geographic locations into a hierarchical structure. Then when you keyword a shot, it can bring in the keywords for the whole tree. Let's say I shoot a government building in Denver. Assuming I built the location keyword tree, I can set Lightroom to store the entire tree with each shot (USA, Colorado, Denver County, Denver). Then when I do a search on Colorado, that shot will pop up. If I search on USA, it will pop up there too.
You can also specify whether or not to include synonyms, and whether or not to use the trees when you export the file. I sometimes build up the entire taxonomy for unusual animal species in keywords, but I don't always want to export all those keywords when I send out a given pic - easily specified in Lightroom.
Lightroom also helps with the storing of captions and titles. If you shoot the same thing a lot, it eventually learns which descriptions and keywords you tend to use, and offers to automatically fill them in when you start typing.
It's hard to explain all this in a text post. But once you see it in action, you understand the utility very quickly. For me, one of the biggest benefits to Lightroom is the way it handles file management. When I pop my cards into my computer, I have Lightroom set to automatically copy them to multiple locations for backup, put them in folders by shoot date, automatically apply certain development settings, rename them to whatever project name I want, etc., etc. Not a big deal if you shoot 100 shots a year, but a huge deal if you shoot a few hundred a day.