Aviator47 wrote:
ericalm wrote:
Though there's not a simple direct correlation between price and quality, you're not going to get much more than a plastic bucket with cheap padding and materials and maybe a decent looking (online) paint job for under $100.
Read this article. It's a long read, but the interesting item is:
The DOT helmets we had were all plastic-shelled, and none cost more than $100. How did they do? They kicked butt. In what must be considered a head-impact Cinderella story, the DOT-only helmets from Z1R delivered less average G force to the headform through all the impacts than any others in the test.
Z1R full face
http://www.ridersdiscount.com/street-gear/helmets-full-face/77203.php I'm pretty familiar with that article and have read it many times. I was oversimplifying... Yes you can get a lid that offers decent protection for $100. I wear the $150 Vega Summit modular, which compares quite well to models that cost 3 times as much.
A "good" helmet, IMHO, has to do
more than offer adequate impact protection. A cheap helmet that can take a pounding is often still a cheap helmet. From the
Webbikeworld review of the Z1R tested in the article:
We'll admit that it falls below our standards for a helmet that we could live with, day in and day out. Its internal shape is too uncomfortable for many riders. We have some questions about the internal helmet shape and how it might affect the transmission of energy for those whose head shapes don't match. The liner is thin, stiff and the material feels scratchy. The visor borders on unacceptable and the venting is nearly non-existent.
A helmet that can protect my head but is uncomfortable, itchy, poorly vented and has a crappy visor is still not something I'm interested in buying. There are some better helmets in the $100 range (Fulmer comes to mind) But several other companies have very good ones in the $150.
So I'll partially retract what I said but also clarify: The point is, stay away from that cheap stuff that's sold almost exclusively online but looks good in photos. Chances are, it won't be.
e1pis wrote:
Personally I don't trust DOT certified alone unless it's a real high-end brand like Arai or Shoei.
DOT is not a matter of certification, it's a matter of standards compliance. Manufacturers claim they comply with DOT (FMVSS 218) and slap a sticker on. The
NHTSA then tests some helmets for compliance, but not all.
As I've complained about here before, you will find many helmets which have failed DOT testing for sale online as "DOT compliant." If they fail, there's a recall, but it's voluntary and depends on the manufacturer and retailers to notify buyers. (Helmets can fail for a number of reasons and this may not always trigger a recall.)
Unscrupulous retailers sometimes continue selling the damn things as DOT, though. Most folks are unlikely to check the web sites of the more responsible sellers and the NHTSA every year to see if their helmet failed.
It's a pretty toothless system that has little relevance when non-compliant helmets will stay on the market unless tested, consumers will usually not know if a model has failed and some retailers keep selling them as DOT anyways.