@volosong avatar
UTC

Molto Verboso
2010 GTS 300, 2008 MP3 500
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1284
Location: Rathdrum, ID
 
Molto Verboso
@volosong avatar
2010 GTS 300, 2008 MP3 500
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1284
Location: Rathdrum, ID
UTC quote
BleuBelle wrote:
...
I would suggest you get a tall windscreen, unless you like road noise and freezing in winter months.
+1 - makes for an "enjoyable" commute, but expect your fuel consumption mileage to suffer.
@bleubelle avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
2010 GTS 300 Super "Yukihime" 2013 BV350 "Silvar""
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2494
Location: South SF Bay Area
 
Ossessionato
@bleubelle avatar
2010 GTS 300 Super "Yukihime" 2013 BV350 "Silvar""
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2494
Location: South SF Bay Area
UTC quote
volosong wrote:
BleuBelle wrote:
...
I would suggest you get a tall windscreen, unless you like road noise and freezing in winter months.
+1 - makes for an "enjoyable" commute, but expect your fuel consumption mileage to suffer.
Possibly, but I note that my average mpg is better than yours. Razz emoticon
I do intend to perform a windscreen-ectomy and chop off about 6-8 inches at the top in the future.
@volosong avatar
UTC

Molto Verboso
2010 GTS 300, 2008 MP3 500
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1284
Location: Rathdrum, ID
 
Molto Verboso
@volosong avatar
2010 GTS 300, 2008 MP3 500
Joined: UTC
Posts: 1284
Location: Rathdrum, ID
UTC quote
BleuBelle wrote:
volosong wrote:
BleuBelle wrote:
...
I would suggest you get a tall windscreen, unless you like road noise and freezing in winter months.
+1 - makes for an "enjoyable" commute, but expect your fuel consumption mileage to suffer.
Possibly, but I note that my average mpg is better than yours. Razz emoticon
I do intend to perform a windscreen-ectomy and chop off about 6-8 inches at the top in the future.
I ride with a full-sized screen, unmodified. I figure I lost about 5 mpg with that thing on. Last summer, when it warmed up here in the desert, I swapped out the full-size screen for the flyscreen. That lasted for about an hour before I put the full-size screen back on ... where it has stayed since. It's nice not having to worry about bugs in my teeth or tears streaming out the corners of my eyes. I can actually hear the engine too. For me, the benefits of the full-size screen outweigh the loss of mpg.

- - - edited to add - - -

p.s. I tool through the top of the screen ... about four of five inches below the top edge. Only problem is once when I was caught out in a rain storm. Couldn't see through the thing then. Otherwise ... I love it!
@bleubelle avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
2010 GTS 300 Super "Yukihime" 2013 BV350 "Silvar""
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2494
Location: South SF Bay Area
 
Ossessionato
@bleubelle avatar
2010 GTS 300 Super "Yukihime" 2013 BV350 "Silvar""
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2494
Location: South SF Bay Area
UTC quote
volosong wrote:
BleuBelle wrote:
Possibly, but I note that my average mpg is better than yours. Razz emoticon
I do intend to perform a windscreen-ectomy and chop off about 6-8 inches at the top in the future.
I ride with a full-sized screen, unmodified. I figure I lost about 5 mpg with that thing on.
I too, ride with an unmodified screen. I like the noise and wind reduction very much. Without it, it feels like my head will snap off when I turn it if I'm in the slipstream.
When I ride my LX150 which only has a flyscreen, I notice the difference in terms of body temp. All that air hits me right below my helmet about mid-chest...brrr.
@stinkyjones avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
2009 GTV 244, 2005 BMW F652 CS, 2001 ET4 150
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2379
Location: Chicago, IL
 
Ossessionato
@stinkyjones avatar
2009 GTV 244, 2005 BMW F652 CS, 2001 ET4 150
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2379
Location: Chicago, IL
UTC quote
jess wrote:
[It's because the 300 has a steep drop-off in power at RPMs lower than the 250. On the freeway, this translates into a difficulty overcoming wind drag, or "running out of steam". The 250 doesn't accelerate off the line as fast, but it seems more able to sustain freeway speeds.

(This is usually where VEZPA jumps in to tell me that his 300 can do GPS-verified 85mph all day long, and therefore I must be wrong Razz emoticon)
No response on this for 1 full day?
Has somebody checked with VEZPA's family to make sure he is okay?
@chetwynder avatar
UTC

Ossessionato
Baart-less
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4499
Location: 56°58'34.49"N x 111°29'38.40"W
 
Ossessionato
@chetwynder avatar
Baart-less
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4499
Location: 56°58'34.49"N x 111°29'38.40"W
UTC quote
jess wrote:
Pacnwfoto wrote:
jess wrote:
Believe it or not, I prefer the 250 on the freeway.
Jess, is that because of more high rpm punch, or smoothness, or?
It's because the 300 has a steep drop-off in power at RPMs lower than the 250. On the freeway, this translates into a difficulty overcoming wind drag, or "running out of steam". The 250 doesn't accelerate off the line as fast, but it seems more able to sustain freeway speeds.

(This is usually where VEZPA jumps in to tell me that his 300 can do GPS-verified 85mph all day long, and therefore I must be wrong Razz emoticon)
Are we talking stock 250 vs stock 300 or your big bore Malossi 4V head 250 vs stock 300?

This also begs the question of how the 300 performs at higher rpm's with the Malossi head... The dyno charts point towards taking care of the power drop off. Of course this is now getting further away from the original question.


Dave
@jess avatar
UTC

Petty Tyrant
0:7 and counting
Joined: UTC
Posts: 38441
Location: Bay Area, California
 
Petty Tyrant
@jess avatar
0:7 and counting
Joined: UTC
Posts: 38441
Location: Bay Area, California
UTC quote
Chetwynder wrote:
Are we talking stock 250 vs stock 300 or your big bore Malossi 4V head 250 vs stock 300?
I'm talking stock. The Malossi V4 head renders the point moot.
Chetwynder wrote:
This also begs the question of how the 300 performs at higher rpm's with the Malossi head... The dyno charts point towards taking care of the power drop off. Of course this is now getting further away from the original question.
Based on my experience and comparing the dyno charts, the 300 with the V4 head should do very well on the freeway (and everywhere else).
UTC

Banned
Joined: UTC
Posts: 35
 
Banned
Joined: UTC
Posts: 35
UTC quote
jess wrote:
He didn't ask about sport bikes. He asked whether the engine could sustain freeway speeds.

And you wonder why your karma is so bad.
Yes you are right again as always, but I suggested that he is buying the wrong bike, for his needs and let him know that not only will the engine be worn prematurely but so will a host of other parts, with those kind of practices, you should know as you spend most of your time replacing premature worn parts

And I don't wonder why my karma is so bad, we both know how the X's got there, oh nimble fingered one.

Modern Vespa is the premier site for modern Vespa and Piaggio scooters. Vespa GTS300, GTS250, GTV, GT200, LX150, LXS, ET4, ET2, MP3, Fuoco, Elettrica and more.

Buy Me A Coffee
 

Shop on Amazon with Modern Vespa

Modern Vespa is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com


All Content Copyright 2005-2025 by Modern Vespa.
All Rights Reserved.


[ Time: 0.0226s ][ Queries: 3 (0.0110s) ][ live ][ 329 ][ ThingOne ]