BleuBelle wrote:
...
I would suggest you get a tall windscreen, unless you like road noise and freezing in winter months.
I would suggest you get a tall windscreen, unless you like road noise and freezing in winter months.
|
UTC
quote
BleuBelle wrote: ... I would suggest you get a tall windscreen, unless you like road noise and freezing in winter months. |
Ossessionato
![]() 2010 GTS 300 Super "Yukihime" 2013 BV350 "Silvar""
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2494 Location: South SF Bay Area |
UTC
quote
volosong wrote: BleuBelle wrote: ... I would suggest you get a tall windscreen, unless you like road noise and freezing in winter months. ![]() I do intend to perform a windscreen-ectomy and chop off about 6-8 inches at the top in the future. |
|
UTC
quote
BleuBelle wrote: volosong wrote: BleuBelle wrote: ... I would suggest you get a tall windscreen, unless you like road noise and freezing in winter months. ![]() I do intend to perform a windscreen-ectomy and chop off about 6-8 inches at the top in the future. - - - edited to add - - - p.s. I tool through the top of the screen ... about four of five inches below the top edge. Only problem is once when I was caught out in a rain storm. Couldn't see through the thing then. Otherwise ... I love it! |
Ossessionato
![]() 2010 GTS 300 Super "Yukihime" 2013 BV350 "Silvar""
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2494 Location: South SF Bay Area |
UTC
quote
volosong wrote: BleuBelle wrote: Possibly, but I note that my average mpg is better than yours. ![]() I do intend to perform a windscreen-ectomy and chop off about 6-8 inches at the top in the future. When I ride my LX150 which only has a flyscreen, I notice the difference in terms of body temp. All that air hits me right below my helmet about mid-chest...brrr. |
![]() UTC
Ossessionato
2009 GTV 244, 2005 BMW F652 CS, 2001 ET4 150
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2379 Location: Chicago, IL |
|
Ossessionato
![]() 2009 GTV 244, 2005 BMW F652 CS, 2001 ET4 150
Joined: UTC
Posts: 2379 Location: Chicago, IL |
UTC
quote
jess wrote: [It's because the 300 has a steep drop-off in power at RPMs lower than the 250. On the freeway, this translates into a difficulty overcoming wind drag, or "running out of steam". The 250 doesn't accelerate off the line as fast, but it seems more able to sustain freeway speeds. (This is usually where VEZPA jumps in to tell me that his 300 can do GPS-verified 85mph all day long, and therefore I must be wrong ![]() Has somebody checked with VEZPA's family to make sure he is okay? |
![]() UTC
Ossessionato
Baart-less
Joined: UTC
Posts: 4499 Location: 56°58'34.49"N x 111°29'38.40"W |
|
|
UTC
quote
jess wrote: Pacnwfoto wrote: jess wrote: Believe it or not, I prefer the 250 on the freeway. (This is usually where VEZPA jumps in to tell me that his 300 can do GPS-verified 85mph all day long, and therefore I must be wrong ![]() This also begs the question of how the 300 performs at higher rpm's with the Malossi head... The dyno charts point towards taking care of the power drop off. Of course this is now getting further away from the original question. Dave |
|
UTC
quote
Chetwynder wrote: Are we talking stock 250 vs stock 300 or your big bore Malossi 4V head 250 vs stock 300? Chetwynder wrote: This also begs the question of how the 300 performs at higher rpm's with the Malossi head... The dyno charts point towards taking care of the power drop off. Of course this is now getting further away from the original question. |
|
UTC
quote
jess wrote: He didn't ask about sport bikes. He asked whether the engine could sustain freeway speeds. And you wonder why your karma is so bad. And I don't wonder why my karma is so bad, we both know how the X's got there, oh nimble fingered one. |
Modern Vespa is the premier site for modern Vespa and Piaggio scooters. Vespa GTS300, GTS250, GTV, GT200, LX150, LXS, ET4, ET2, MP3, Fuoco, Elettrica and more.